As I was performance tuning a query, I found that a number of date calculation functions in SQL Server appear to be forcing a conversion of their date parameters to a specific datatype, adding computational work to a query that uses them. In programming terms, it seems that these functions do not have “overloads”, i.e. different code paths depending on the incoming datatype.
So let’s take a closer look at how this manifests itself.
Continue readingImplicit conversions in SQL Server follow a specific, predictable order, called data type precedence. This means that if you compare or add/concatenate two values, a and b, with different data types, you can predict which one will be implicitly converted to the data type of the other one in order to be able to complete the operation.
I stumbled on an interesting exception to this rule the other day.
Continue readingDate and time values are not entirely intuitive to aggregate into averages in T-SQL, although the business case does arguably exist. Suppose, for instance, that you have a production log with a “duration” column (in the “time” datatype), and you want to find the totalt or average duration for a certain group of items.
It’s possible, but I would still call it a workaround.
Continue readingAt one point or another, you’re going to come across intervals when working in SQL Server. You could say that an interval is where you don’t have a single value, but actually a range of values, commonly delimited within a start and an end value. This range could be a group of accounts, versions of dimension members (in an SCD) or date/time intervals.
Have you noticed how date conversions can seem a bit arbitrary at times? How a string value is translated to a date depends on a number of factors, including how you perform the conversion and what language settings you have set for your connection. But there are ways to limit your conversion headaches.
sqlsunday.com 